<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: StumbleUpon vs Technorati vs Digg vs Delicious</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thebillionairegirl.wordpress.com/2009/01/02/stumbleupon-vs-technorati-vs-digg-vs-delicious/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thebillionairegirl.wordpress.com/2009/01/02/stumbleupon-vs-technorati-vs-digg-vs-delicious/</link>
	<description>Staying a positive business owner in a hectic economy and a few helpful tips along the way...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2009 05:28:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Doug Caldwell</title>
		<link>http://thebillionairegirl.wordpress.com/2009/01/02/stumbleupon-vs-technorati-vs-digg-vs-delicious/#comment-32</link>
		<dc:creator>Doug Caldwell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Feb 2009 18:23:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thebillionairegirl.wordpress.com/?p=192#comment-32</guid>
		<description>Just what I was looking for.  Considering just one bookmarking application.  As you wrote the stumbleupon has easier to feature using the firefox add-on.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just what I was looking for.  Considering just one bookmarking application.  As you wrote the stumbleupon has easier to feature using the firefox add-on.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Luis Guajardo</title>
		<link>http://thebillionairegirl.wordpress.com/2009/01/02/stumbleupon-vs-technorati-vs-digg-vs-delicious/#comment-14</link>
		<dc:creator>Luis Guajardo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Jan 2009 03:44:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thebillionairegirl.wordpress.com/?p=192#comment-14</guid>
		<description>technorati loses.  it&#039;s a tie between stumbleupon and digg.  to be honest...i like digg more because it is better at getting you readers that will actually like your post.  they search it out in topics and they find it.

stumbleupon is more &quot;by accident&quot;. even though people enter the categories that they like...they are just &quot;stumbling&quot; blindly through sites (for the most part...some people do search) until they find something they like.

but in the end...stumbleupon has brought me slightly more traffic, but as my digg profile gets older...the traffic grows!

just my 2 cents</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>technorati loses.  it&#8217;s a tie between stumbleupon and digg.  to be honest&#8230;i like digg more because it is better at getting you readers that will actually like your post.  they search it out in topics and they find it.</p>
<p>stumbleupon is more &#8220;by accident&#8221;. even though people enter the categories that they like&#8230;they are just &#8220;stumbling&#8221; blindly through sites (for the most part&#8230;some people do search) until they find something they like.</p>
<p>but in the end&#8230;stumbleupon has brought me slightly more traffic, but as my digg profile gets older&#8230;the traffic grows!</p>
<p>just my 2 cents</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Osama</title>
		<link>http://thebillionairegirl.wordpress.com/2009/01/02/stumbleupon-vs-technorati-vs-digg-vs-delicious/#comment-10</link>
		<dc:creator>Osama</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2009 04:12:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thebillionairegirl.wordpress.com/?p=192#comment-10</guid>
		<description>1. Stumbleupon
2. Digg
3. nothing ... :P</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>1. Stumbleupon<br />
2. Digg<br />
3. nothing &#8230; <img src='http://s.wordpress.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_razz.gif' alt=':P' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
